Kubrick’s Final Masterpiece: Eyes Wide Shut Review

Eyes Wide Shut Mask

Perhaps the most fervently anticipated “art house” flick in movie history, Eyes Wide Shut was the subject of a monstrous level of tabloid gossip and industry speculation in the months (and years) leading up to its release. Director Stanley Kubrick had become a myth in his own time, a film making genius of intimidating reputation, capable of inspiring awe throughout the movie industry. Kubrick’s status as a media recluse and the whirlwind of hearsay and media speculation that followed in his wake only served to enhance his aura; he was characterised as a mysterious eccentric, an obsessive perfectionist who was somehow capable of defying Hollywood to make a series of iconoclastic movies on nobodies’ terms but his own.

Not only was Eyes Wide Shut set to become Kubrick’s first movie release in over 12 years, but he’d cast Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman – by far Hollywood’s hottest couple of the day – in the leading roles. Industry hype reached a fever pitch during the course of the film’s punishing two year shoot. Kubrick’s characteristic tight lipped secrecy over his latest film’s content set imaginations racing. Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman would reveal all on screen. Eyes Wide Shut would be a kinky, racy sex thriller featuring Hollywood’s two most bankable stars; something along the lines of Basic Instinct, only backed by the infinitely more reputable artistic clout of a cinematic auteur such as Stanley Kubrick. A misrepresentative promotional campaign, featuring tantalising snippets of Cruise and Kidman in a steamy clinch to the down and dirty soundtrack of Chris Isaak’s Baby Did a Bad Bad Thing only served to whet the feverish appetite of the movie going public.

Four days after delivering a final cut of Eyes Wide Shut to Warner Brothers executives, Kubrick died of heart failure. The publicity surrounding the movie took on a sanctified air. Eyes Wide Shut would be the final statement of one of cinema history’s most celebrated personages.

But when it was finally released in the middle of 1999, Eyes Wide Shut was received with almost universal disappointment. Critics roundly panned the film’s lack of pace and narrative drive. They sneered at the oddly stilted performances and derided the lack of genuine eroticism. Kubrick was out of touch, they said. He’d been a recluse for too long. The wider movie going public, lured along by the titillating promise of spicy goings on between Cruise and Kidman, were simply left baffled by Kubrick’s cold, unsparing exploration of the human condition in the pre-millennial modern world. Disappointment, derision and resentment were the order of the day. “It’s just not sexy enough!” went the bitter, repeated complaints.

Not for the first time, Kubrick had delivered a film that confounded all expectations. Almost all of his films from 2001: A Space Odyssey onwards had been subject to the same reception: initial bewilderment, followed by a gradual process of critical re-evaluation and eventually, anointment into the classical movie canon. But a decade after its release, Eyes Wide Shut is still widely misunderstood. With the possible exception of Barry Lyndon, none of Kubrick’s movies have proven to be so stubborn in garnering wider acceptance. Eyes Wide Shut has its admirers, but there is nothing like the cult devotion accorded to the likes of Dr. Strangelove or A Clockwork Orange. Even Kubrick’s most ardent aficionados remain somewhat baffled by the conundrum that is his final film.

And yet, Eyes Wide Shut is perhaps the most purely Kubrickian film of all. It’s a summation of all of the director’s thematic preoccupations, and the fullest realisation of his stylistic aesthetic. Kubrick, of course, never intended to indulge in outright titillation. Critics have a tendency to gripe over what Kubrick’s films aren’t, rather than what they actually are. Naively, perhaps, they expected him to deliver something akin to an art house porn film. What they actually got was another beast entirely; a dark, disturbing journey into the night that probed into the most base and unflattering aspects of human existence. Eyes Wide Shut is really about man’s place in the social hierarchy. How power and wealth are manipulated flagrantly and without moral conscience. How ultimately, everyone is reduced to a subservient cog in the social structure, ostensibly imposed to maintain order, but manipulated and evaded by all to a degree, each according to his status.

All of which is mused over in a relatively simple narrative framework. Cruise’s Bill Harford is a superficially well-to-do New York doctor and husband to Kidman’s Alice, an elegantly groomed trophy wife. The couple live in a façade of sophistication, affluence and security. It’s an elaborately constructed bubble of illusory outward appearances, masking the true nature of their relationship to each other and the world around them. Neither partner is fully conscious of themselves or the nature of their existence. After an evening of adulterous flirtation at a society ball, Alice’s resentment over her husband’s smug self assurance in the security of their relationship comes seething to the surface in a haze of cannabis intoxication. She drops a revelatory bombshell: a year previous she’d been fully prepared to throw away their marriage on a night of passion with a young naval officer, glimpsed only for a moment on summer vacation. Alice exults in her husband’s devastated reaction, as he suddenly comes to terms with the fragile foundation his superficially comfortable life is built upon. Called away at the crucial moment to attend to a deceased patient, Dr. Bill embarks on a reckless journey into the night, spurred on by his jealousy to pursue adulterous liaisons.

The performances of both leads were widely panned by the critics. Cruise was derided for his blandly vacuous performance and Kidman for her stilted, self conscious delivery. But in fact, both Cruise and Kidman had delivered exactly what was required of them, according to the effect Kubrick was aiming to achieve. Kubrick was renowned for his painstaking diligence in demanding take after take from his actors, until they had produced precisely what he was looking for. The critics forgot that Kubrick has never been particularly interested in naturalistic performances; his method was almost always to select an exaggerated, self conscious or “artificial” take over a “realistic” one. Kubrick was not so much interested in capturing reality as he was an impression of reality. Kidman’s performance is languorous and affected because the film aims to evoke the hypnotic atmosphere of a dream like state. Cruise’s performance is supposed to be bland and vacuous; he’s portraying a cipher, a character lacking in self awareness, imagination or depth.

Eyes Wide

Dr. Bill’s adulterous pursuits wind up immersing him in murky, sinister circumstances that go way beyond his head. In a series of escalating episodes, he finds himself gatecrashing an ultra decadent secret society party. And what he finds there is both inscrutable and terrifying. It’s here that Eyes Wide Shut delivers its centre piece: the infamous orgy sequence that attracted such a large proportion of the critical derision. Apparently, the critics were expecting a gleefully bacchanalian bout of jerk-off material. But Kubrick deliberately drains the sequence of any sexual allure. It’s not erotic, but disturbing; a cold, mechanical cornucopia of sinister masked figures copulating in a perverse ritual of satanic evocation. Bill has accidentally penetrated into the inner sanctum of the worlds’ most wealthy and powerful individuals, and he discovers that it’s rotten and depraved to the core. His indiscretion leads to the (so it is hinted) rape and ritual murder of at least one individual and the possible revenge killing of another.

The most disturbing aspect of Eyes Wide Shut – as is the case with several of Kubrick’s movies – is its cold sense of detachment, utterly devoid of sentimental platitudes. The viewer is placed at a distance from the movie’s events, drained of empathy, as if observing dispassionately from another planet. We are not drawn into the characters’ inner lives, but rather see them as if they are acting out against the tapestry of history in an absurd spectacle of blind futility. We see Bill Harford engaging in a series of frustrating endeavours, driven by nothing but his own basic animal desires, foiled at every turn by powers that are greater than himself. For all his pretensions to sophistication and civility in his smugly self satisfied internal world, he’s exposed as nothing more than another cog in the social hierarchy, subservient to more powerful interests. Despite his best efforts, Bill never does quite manage to cheat on his wife. Social transgression is only permitted to the powerful and wealthy – people like the guests at the secret society orgy – who can use and manipulate the lower orders as if they were possessions. Critics can decry the lack of “warmth” in Kubrick’s films all they like, but there’s no other director who had the courage to face up to such disturbing realities of the human condition.

Dr. Bill attempts to uncover the truth about the secret society and the events he’s become entangled in, only to see his life threatened. The world’s elite apparently don’t take too kindly to the lesser orders interfering in their affairs. In a stunning concluding sequence, Bill is warned off by Victor Ziegler, ostensibly his associate, but in reality his social superior and, so it is revealed, one of the participants in the secret orgy. Sydney Pollack’s performance as Ziegler is simply masterful: he portrays a character who is worldly wise, cynical, self confident, manipulative and ultimately, totally immoral. In other words, Ziegler is one of the world’s masters. Bill has attempted to transgress the boundaries of the social order, and must be taken to task for it. His life is spared – this time – but it’s hinted that others may have paid the price in his place.

Whatever else might by said about Eyes Wide Shut – it’s a stunning film to look at. One of the most intensely realised visual extravaganzas ever committed to celluloid. Kubrick’s obsession with achieving perfection in his lighting of sets was never more fully realised. The camera pans gracefully around the scenes like a Viennese waltz, recalling the cinematography of Max Ophuls at his elegant best. Every shot contains some new wonder for the viewer to feast his eyes upon. As a visual artefact crafted with unparalleled technical expertise, Eyes Wide Shut is unsurpassed.

It’s a dark film and a daring one, almost wilfully and perversely peculiar and, like all of Kubrick’s best work, requiring multiple viewings to fully appreciate in all of its aspects. It’s a disturbing meditation on the nature of power and its misuse, of the decadence and corruption that underlies human society. On another level, it’s a psycho-sexual thriller. It’s disturbing and unsparing about the nature of married relationships, and about the nature of all of society’s structures. But beyond all this, Eyes Wide Shut is a beautiful illustration of cinematic imagination, rich in detail, nuance and visual splendour. It’s Kubrick’s final masterpiece, perhaps the fullest realisation of his unique stylistic aesthetic. It’s high time that Eyes Wide Shut receives its due recognition as one of the master’s finest works.

Eyes Wide Shut – 10/10

Advertisements

7 Responses to Kubrick’s Final Masterpiece: Eyes Wide Shut Review

  1. timlarsen01 says:

    Good review, again. Are you choosing your favourites to review or are they just random choices?

    Here’s my (lazy) review of Eyes Wide Shut, originally here: http://www.fritzlfan.wordpress.com (There’s a reason for why I chose the name lol)

    Some of the reviews in my blog are terrible mind.

    Through a very clever piece of marketing – though some claim it was not his intention – Stanley Kubrick managed to attract members of the public who were curious of the relationship between Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman, who were married at the time of the release of Eyes Wide Shut. This theory of mine that Kubrick purposely attracted an audience who were expecting a film completely different to the outcome is reflected in the films poster – a mirror held up to society to expose their perversions. A great deal of interest was taken over the film – not only because of the aforementioned relationship between the two leads, but also because of the sheer length of time it took to film it; around eighteen months. Several rumours also persisted, one in particular about a certain incident between the original lead actor Harvey Keitel and Nicole Kidman. All this interest gave Kubrick the opportunity to tell the audience his ideas through the film.

    The film has generally received panning from critics and audiences alike, with many considering Eyes Wide Shut to be a disappointing finish to a rather exceptional career. However, it is worth noting that many of Kubrick’s film were not thought of as of great quality upon initial release, The Shining for example was nominated for several Razzie awards, including Worst Director. It is quite possible, then, that time will eventually show Eyes Wide Shut to be right up there with Kubrick’s best. Many think that the film is a dull ‘affair’, and at two and a half hours centred on one scene, it is an understandable criticism.

    The film begins with the married couple at a party hosted by Ziegler (played by the late Sydney Pollack). The relationship between this scene and the famous ‘masked ball’ sequence later on in the film is touched upon here. Two young girls who attempt to seduce Dr. Bill Harford (Tom Cruise’s character) mention that their destination is “at the end of the rainbow.” The shop at which Bill purchases his costume in preparation for the ball is indeed called the Rainbow, therefore hinting that the two young girls attended both events.

    Social status is a key theme of Eyes Wide Shut. It becomes apparent that Dr. Bill (a likely purposeful pun) does not appear to be a particularly intelligent man – rather that he achieved his career path through his social class and his conformist beliefs. The orgy scene is described by Ziegler late on in the film as being made up of those of a high status – lawyers, politicians etc. The secrecy surrounding the party – through passwords and masks – suggests that the identity of the members of the ‘club’ is worth hiding.

    Almost every scene in the film contains Christmas trees or lights. As Christmas is not part of the plot, and the fact that Kubrick is in the chair, suggests that there is a hidden message. My theory on this is that, due to the upper/middle classes being a key theme, Kubrick is telling us that Christmas is simply a time when people are forced to purchase unnecessary items and give business owners a nice profit out of ‘goodwill.’

    Another anti-authoritative message (key throughout Kubrick’s latter-day works) is the treatment of women in society. During the first party, Kidman’s character Alice mentions how she was invited for one reason. Ziegler has a prostitute with him whom he is having trouble with, thus showing that Alice’s ponderings were indeed correct. Though seemingly the more intelligent of the couple, Alice stays at home to look after the children whilst Bill earns his money by working in a doctor’s surgery. It was after a re-watch that I realised that my dislike for Kidman’s character was in all likelihood Kubrick’s intention. Her sins in lusting after men were equalled by Bill’s ventures, though I initially thought his actions were justified.

    Many conspiracy theories have been raised surrounding this film. These range from Kubrick being murdered as he died 666 days before the first day of 2001 and his exposure of the Illuminati through symbolism to Kidman and Cruise themselves being involved in his death. Though some are quite preposterous, there are plenty of suspicions regarding the two leads as they clearly pretend to be upset by his death in several interviews. There is also no denying that Kubrick did include Illuminati symbology in this film, as he did with several of his other pictures.

    A hugely under-rated film, for the moment at least, Eyes Wide Shut shows Kubrick’s true genius behind the camera. It certainly has more to offer than the much recalled dream sequence at the Somerton mansion, to both fans and non-fans of Kubrick. Like many other Kubrick films, 2001-onwards especially, viewing the film on multiple occasions is a necessity in order the see the whole picture and uncover Kubrick’s true intentions.

  2. robertod says:

    Good review. I’d say most of that is pretty much on point. I’m not so sure if Kubrick deliberately planned the marketing of the film so much as Warner Bros recognised the kind of hype that was building for Eyes Wide Shut and rode with it. In hindsight, I do think the critical reaction to the film and the total and utter misunderstanding of Kubrick’s intentions is quite funny. But there’s no doubt that this has also contributed the the film’s lack of acclaim over the years. It might not get its due recognition of another decade.

    In answer to your question, I’ve just been reviewing films as and when I’ve seen them, rather than picking out my favourites. In the case of Eyes Wide Shut, I’d been defending the film for some time on the IMDB board and I just felt like it was time to try and sum up some of my thoughts about it.

  3. Chris says:

    I think you meant to say ‘flagrantly’ not ‘fragrantly’

  4. light and sound machine, brain machine,meditation…

    […]Kubrick’s Final Masterpiece: Eyes Wide Shut Review « The Inquisitor[…]…

  5. Stan says:

    Woody Allen’s film Annie Hall (1977) has many similarities and can be seen almost as a spiritual prequel to Eyes wide shut. I know Stanley Kubrick was a big fan of the film when it came out and used it as a basis for EWS. One line that particularly stands out in Annie Hall is: “You are using the Conspiracy Theory as an excuse for not having sex with me!”. This basically summarises what eyes wide shut is all about in which bill Hartford is getting caught up in his own fantasy involving fantastical conspiracies (look at the sommerton orgy/paranoid beauty queen killed/getting followed by Ziegler henchman) which he is making up just so he does not have to go face his wife alice and have sex with her (until at the end of the film in which alice forces him to when she says “something important we have to do…FUCK”).

    Here are some more interesting facts that point to the Annie Hall/ eyes wide shut connection:

    1) Woody Allen was supposed to play bill Hartford originally but Kubrick was not able to get him so he turned to Tom crushes instead. http://www.imdb.com/news/ni0068416/

    2) In Annie Hall there is a scene involving smoking pot almost exactly like eyes wide shut and wearing same clothing type as well.

    3) Diana Keaton in the film resembles the character of alice played by Nicole Kidman in not only appearance but also in profession in which she used to work in a art gallery (showed the first date on the roof).

    4) Interestingly Shelly Duvall (Wendy in the shining ) is in the film playing one of the girlfriends. (This was her role before the shining) which Kubrick saw the film and got the idea to use her in the shining.

    5) Woody Allen just like Tom Cruise had his own personal marriage problems. If you remember the huge scandal in the 90s in which Woody Allen split with his wife because he was having an affair with his adopted 18 year old Asian stepdaughter (maybe a nod to Milich and his daughter with the Japanese men which Kubrick slyly wrote in the script which he kept even after Tom cruise came aboard). Either way its obvious that Kubrick wanted the role of Bill Hartford to be played with someone who was having real life marriage problems (either woody Allen or Tom cruise would have done).

    Anyone who has not watched Annie Hall should go do so it really is almost like a companion piece to Eyes wide shut.

  6. James says:

    my name is james i really want to share my testimony on how i became an
    Illuminati member, through my friend. i was moving with my friend for more
    than 10 years and he have been getting rich everyday and even giving me
    money but he never told me the secret of his success until a day i was
    frustrated to let him know that he should help me also that was when he
    open up to me and tell me that he was a member of the Illuminati that he
    have been in the court for more than 10 years that his riches and
    protection came from this court.so i told him to let me be into the court
    but it not an easy task to be a member but i was finally initiated into the
    devil church of the Illuminati and i was confirm in there church. after a
    month of being a member of Illuminati i got promotion that same month in my
    working place and within a year i was promoted thrice in my working place
    to the extend of being a managing Director i never know how to thank this
    church of Illuminati and today am rich as my friend also, and also the one
    that surprise me most was that i got an accident with my new car and the
    car was right off but i still survive the accident and nothing happen to me
    i really thank you people Illuminati. so i just want to share to the world
    that this is real and it have help me and work for me so if you want to
    become a member i can lead you into the court of richness and you will
    never be poor again, know that it only a member in the Illuminati that can
    initiate you into the church of illumination they do not contact directly
    because they are fake Illuminati all over the world, this is my email
    ilueminosenrealspell@gmail.com they will tell you how to join,

  7. mark warner says:

    What is the purpose of The name being Dr. Bill Hartford, but on the note he gets when he goes back to the mansion the next day, being Harford (no “T”)?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: